Recently there are many sad news around. Today i was stunned when Luqman visited me in my room. He told me he had dropped ECC3105 Microprocessor due to some reasons. I am very sad to hear this, because i will have lesser time to meet him. He is one of the nice person that i spotted since the beginning. He always approaches me in friendly way, greet me politely, and we joke around. Maybe he is struggling to cope with his academic misery, but mentally and physically he is very fit. Hereby, I wish him all the best among the best, you impressed me alot.
Proceed to other scope, in my point of view, academic achivements is important, nevertheless rational, analytic, and intellectual thinking or mindset give better and significant value to a person. Because of this, I would never ask how much someone has contributed to me, but in a opposite way, I would question myself how much i have contributed to them. So is the person who casts the ballot to agree Dr.Ing Fauzi deserves to be complained is the same person who lodged a complain report to Timbalan Dekan ? Bah kata pepatah, Siapa Makan Cilis, Dia Rasa Pedas.
p/s : Do not find your seat according to the number, I am against the issue, not the person.
Cheers,
Candle
I'm Back, With an App!
10 years ago
3 comments:
yoong ching,
luqman came to meet me last nite but i was wearing a towel (just had my shower and baru balik kerja). tell him that i am sorry that i could not invite him in since i was a mess at that time.
how time passes very fast that i have been with you guys for 3 semesters. i was forced to become a superman with a super psychic power that i have to know every each of you without you guys telling me who you are and what your problems are. allow us the lecturers and tutors to know your problems before hand so that we could adjust and bend our rules/regulations.
i would like to meet and have a not serious (other than academic) chat my students and if they have any problems with any subjects i may suggest to whom they should refer to or get help. tell luqman, i apologize to him openly for me labeling him problematic student. i hope i was wrong. dropping the subject will drag his study in the future. he has to wait until microP is offered and i will tell you this, if you didnt urge Dr Khairul to take over the subject, the same lecturer will be teaching microP. if luqman hasnt yet meet the PA, please advise him to do so. if you need me to talk to AJ, i could help but i cannot guarantee any good outcome. to keep a problem in silence is similar to living in denial.
on the second paragraph, i know to whom you are referring your writing to. i hope the two of you could sort this thing out. the reason i created the blog and i want you guys to blog is so that we could interact intellectually. i have met fauzi yesterday evening. he said he just need to justify to the TDA why the number of student getting A was so large, and at the same time why there was a report against him. he managed to make clear of himself. it is no longer an issue. after all we have published few publications based on our finding made on you guys.
very few would have shared the same idea with you. we know one's man meal may be another man's poison. what i perceive now is like the lull before the storm. if there were/are so many sad news, please make a happy one for me. please....
i want my students to unite and to have the sense of cohesiveness/togetherness. it is sad if this difference to prolong. i am not favoring anyone. you, him, her, she, he are all my students. i will in anytime treat you equally.
yoong ching, on a less serious note, i like the way you use the pepatah, tapi ada sedikit salah. sepatutnya, Bak kata pepatah siapa makan CILI (bukan cilis), dia terasa pedas.keep on writing, i am always checking new post from you.
P/S: i dont really catch the meaning of ur P/S. did miss anything here??
-Azrin-
Yesterday, Luqman conducted a course dropping procedure after seeking advises from his PA. Last night, he managed to fullfil his task by giving me 57 copies of survey conducted on final year CCSE out of 65 in total. Then he visited you.
As far as i am concerned, I had asked a few classmates, they want to proceed Microp subject with AJ, and surprisingly they refused to agree the complain on AJ. We shall stop all this, any problems should be directly referred to AJ or lecturers before taking any silly and irresponsible motion. Even if it happens in parliamentary house, a simple majority is needed for particular motion. So, make it transparent if there is anything to do with ECC department.
Another thing is, AJ is a quite friendly senior lecturer, I always pay him a visit whenever I am free to consult advise regarding to the lecture. I share whatever I gained with my friends too. He is very happy to see his student coming to meet him. That is what i experienced.
My intention to post the poll is to yield the awareness among us that, we should not be a double face person and individualistic person. Listen to other people voice, comment and criticism from our friends, because we want him to be our good friend too.
About the pepatah, i purposely make it with extra S, to show that it was not the first time, instead it was repeated many times. Sometimes I feel uncomfortable to express something directly, it is better to hide something in a "Tersirat" way, so both party will have the space to come down.
Lastly, the p/s i made is that i do not want certain person to find his seat by referring to the number, means that actually my purpose on Fauzi topic is to focus on the issue, not to attack the person personally. I hope from the result of the poll, some meaningful message can be delivered, to prevent segregration on particular individual. I hope it is not true, just my shallow observation (2cents).
Cheers,
Candle
yoong ching,
ok i fully understood and i agreed with you.
i hope you could educate me with your finding, seriously. this is to help me to improve handling and tackling my students. if you would want to share personal criticism write to e-mail. or if you want to make it public i have nothing to go against.
i hope we could argue and communicate effectively and intellectually.
Post a Comment